Nov 14, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Run for the Ranch Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Run for the Ranch Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 3.5 
Organization 3.7 
Spectators 3.2
Number of comments: 57 [displaying comments 41 to 51]
|
J. S. from Kansas City, MO
(12/29/2008)
"Well organized small race" (about: 2008)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 2 Overall, this race is exactly as advertised on their website. The course is a 5K loop that is flat with a few slight inclines. There are 2 aid stations that were stocked well with PowerAde, water and GU. The volunteers at the aid station by the start were especially helpful. The second half of the race they would ask you what you wanted when you were 20 yards away from the station and were very supportive. The food at the end was a nice touch. Very little crowd support; however, it is a very spectator friendly course for your friends and family to watch the race. The weather was fantastic. High 40's at the start and 40 at the finish. The only complaint I have is that the race director did not have a bull horn at the start so you could not hear his instructions and likewise his call for the start. Overall I recommend this race as a good end-of-the-year marathon in a cool/mild climate. I also got a PR after running my 9th marathon in Dallas 2 weeks prior to the race due in large part to the fantastic course and weather. | |
|
J. v. from The Great State of Texas
(12/18/2008)
"Why does everybody hate this race? I loved it!" (about: 2006)
50+ previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 Okay, I ran back '06. Maybe '06 was a better year, but I do seem to remember a nice light drizzle and temperatures dropping below freezing, so how much better of a year could that have been?! I liked the race. I was in full dread of going, but in '06 it was on NYE! I thought that was wonderful. Run a marathon and then have NYE party! I had a blast! As for my dread of running 8 loops, it turned out to be the best part! I am not fast, so I got to run half the race in the dark. The course runs in a neighborhood for the most part, so there were Christmas lights to cheer you up. The best part of 8 loops: you got to be friends with the rest stop volunteers after a few laps. They were expecting you and knew what you wanted! It was fun to interact with the same people over and over again. It may just be something that I like as nobody else mentioned this as a plus. Don't all races have one line for bibs and one line for shirts? Why complain about that here? In all fairness, I think that they were very low on medals when I finished. I don't know if they ran out. Also, in all fairness to the complainers, volunteers were not at all intersections after the fastest people had finished... but you should know the way after 5 or 6 loops!!!! Sheesh! How can you not learn the loop after three hours of running it??? Okay, it isn't a closed course; they do let people come home from work and shopping. Not many courses are closed, so why complain now??? Oh, is it important that somebody running a 5-hour marathon "cheated"? I mean, there were volunteers out for the fast crowd... I could care less about what the slower people like me did... cut a corner? Who cares? We are not going lose the race, as it is over already, and we just have not yet finished. So... I loved the loops and getting to know the volunteers. Unique to start in the daylight and finish in the dark. I have done it the other way many times, but this is new to me! Hot food. A decent shirt. A good price. A small race with race day pick-up. It was a good time for me. Why can't it be NYE again? My running buddies prefer to be home NYE with the family so they all like this date... I liked the running the last race of the year on NYE. I was out-voted 7 to 1... so this MUST be the better date - the last Sunday of the year, not the last day. I am sorry that so many people did not have fun... I loved it! | |
|
J. N. from Maryland
(10/4/2008)
"Poorly Organinzed" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
COURSE: 1 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 2 I was one of 15 female marathon runners and my time was not recorded. I came all the way from Maryland and I left without a time. My age group award was given to another runner. I asked the race director to update my results in MarathonGuide, and he said it was too much of a hassle. I am in the 50 States Club and this was my least favorite marathon. Running loops late in the afternoon on a boring course and not receiving a time is not my idea of a fun marathon. Packet pickup was a mess for those who had pre-registered and was a breeze for walk-in. I am glad my entry fee went to a good cause. This is a fund-raising event, so I do want to say that the race director and volunteers are wonderful people for helping to raise money for children. Runners looking for an interesting course, organized event and a time... beware! | |
|
T. M. from Oklahoma
(8/30/2008)
"Poorly organized" (about: 2007)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 4 This race promises many things on the application that it simply doesn't deliver. Packet pickup was poorly done. I heard more than one runner say they hoped the timing people didn't mess the times up again this year. The race director needs to pay more attention to the details. | |
|
J. M. from MO
(1/15/2008)
"Lots of potential..." (about: 2007)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 5 This is a unique race with loads of potential, but it suffers from a few "growing pains." Course: At first glance, eight-plus laps around the same route can seem a little daunting. But I was pleasantly surprised, as it was a nice "mental treat" to be able to say, "Only two more laps" at mile 20. The course is pretty flat, especially for Springfield, MO, but there were a couple issues. There do need to be more course volunteers at intersections, especially after dark, since it is open to traffic (the volunteers seemed to thin out as the afternoon passed). And the concern that people might have cut off part of the course is legitimate. Organization: I basically echo some of the other comments mentioned on this topic. The registration and check-in tables need to be clearly identified, and the process streamlined. A number of people waited in one line for several minutes, only to find they should have been waiting in another. The shirt is your basic short-sleeved cotton tee. Regarding the medal, I thought the horse design was nice, in keeping with the charity supported by the race, but the medals had no reference to the length of the race completed. It could have been a 5K or a marathon... there's no way to tell. A less generic medal would be nice. They also ran out of medals, causing local runners to have to wait two weeks, then drive across town to get theirs. I wonder if some of these problems might have arisen from an unexpectedly large turnout for the event. Spectators: More than you'd expect for the Sunday afternoon after Christmas in Springfield. The nice thing is that you get to keep passing them over and over. Larry's fans were great. Overall, the Run for the Ranch has the potential to grow into a great race. Its shortcomings are easily fixed, making this a good destination for a year-end event. | |
|
Paul Kilvington from Jonesboro, Arkansas
(1/13/2008)
"Mmmmm, did my medal come from a rodeo?!!!" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 2 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 2 Was dreading this race, as it entailed 8 laps of the same course, but at the same time I was intrigued by it. It begins at 2:30 p.m., which is an odd time for a long race and most people's biorhythms were in for a shock. On arrival there were two lines at registration, and as no signs were up, I stood in the wrong one for 20 minutes before an announcement was made as to what the lines were actually for. (I was a little worried about this race as they had already lost my application, but not my check....) Another announcement was made as to a problem with the T-shirts. (I never saw one, and never got one - and if it has a horse on it I don't want one!) Finally, we lined up for the race only to find that there was a problem with the megaphone and very few runners were quiet enough to hear the poor organizer trying to tell us about how the 5K, 10K, half-marathon and marathon runners were supposed to run out so far before turning around to make their distances. I sensed confusion was rampant. So the race started and it wasn't too long before we had the sight of other runners coming back towards us. It was very annoying getting out of their way, and vice versa I am sure. Throughout the marathon, some runners were not following the official course and cheating with shortcuts, and I feel sure some of the personal bests or even the Boston times might be a little shady. (I wonder if the Boston Marathon knows about the poor marshaling....) One worrying fact to me as a runner and an organizer myself was that some of the intersections were not manned, especially as darkness set in and I had a confrontation with a motorist. The course was generally mundane and it took a lot of willpower for me not to just stop and finish early. When I did finally finish, there was no medal waiting for me at the finish line. (I had to ferret one out at the post-race festivities.) Overall the race was ok but nothing special. However it does have the potential to be special. The volunteers and few spectators were great and I admire them for sticking out the cold, especially when darkness set in. Registration needs a little more organizing (signs are wonderful!). The megaphone needs new batteries. The course needs manning to prevent "cheats." Have the other races start at different times or even places. Have enough t-shirts and please, please change that awful medal. I ran a marathon - I did not ride a horse in a rodeo event!!! The trophies were also horses.... | |
|
B. H. from KCMO
(1/6/2008)
"Better organization would make this a great race." (about: 2007)
3 previous marathons
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 3 Poorly organized. Packet pick up was right before the race: we had to stand in one line for bib number then in a SECOND line for the t-shirt! Inefficient. On-line registrants were guaranteed a shirt, yet a week later, I'm still waiting for mine in the mail. The course was also not well monitored. I saw 2 or 3 people take short-cuts of several blocks. If this is a Boston qualifier, I think you should monitor the intersections. Thank God for Larry's fans! They made my day! The food at the end was yummy. | |
|
Rob Klein from Aurora, Colorado
(1/4/2008)
"A Pleasant Race on a late December Day" (about: 2007)
11-50 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 This was a small, well organized event. It was an 8-loop course, but was not too bad. A slight incline in the early part of the loop, but no hills, and otherwise flat. The weather was perfect for a December marathon, with a mid-afternoon start. And after dark, when the temperatures dropped, you were already warmed up. The darkness never created a safety concern. There was adequate light after sunset to compete safely. There were water/refreshment stops at the start/finish line, and at the turn-around point, with very friendly volunteers. There was hot food, crackers, cookies and the like, in the church gym for after the race. It was great effort and a great marathon. | |
|
K. S. from Tulsa, Oklahoma
(1/3/2008)
"Here we go loop-de-loop." (about: 2007)
6-10 previous marathons
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 For a small-town race, this was run well. I have run loop courses but felt that 8 loops was a bit much to focus on, on on top of running the marathon. It would have been nice - since it was "chip timed" to get split times - which would have helped counting laps. After dark, the traffic control was poor, as just before crossing a major intersection, a truck drove right over the course cones and kept on going. I would do this one again now that I have run it and know what to expect. Also, an earlier start would have it lighter during more of the race. | |
|
N. B. from KC Missouri
(1/2/2008)
"Great way to end the year" (about: 2007)
6-10 previous marathons
| 1 Run for the Ranch Marathon
COURSE: 3 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 4 Pros Course - Watching the leaders run by me as they lapped me was much more exhilarating than the "out and backs" I've run. Because it was 8 loops, it was easy to plan for the water stations, and I didn't carry any water. Start time in the afternoon with a finish towards the evening was very convenient for my schedule. Crew - I could see that the volunteers were taxed by the large number of people registering the day of the race. This meant that they had to plan on the fly for extra water, cups, and other needs - everyone did this well and without hysterics. Cons: Course - It's not "scenic." It was run pretty much on an honor system and unfortunately a couple runners weren't very honorable about staying on the course if shortcuts benefited them. It's implied that with a flat course, this should be fast, but with several turn-arounds and multiple turns each lap, you'll find faster courses without looking too hard. Organization - Could be better. My friend who registered the day of the race was able to get his number before I did, even though I registered weeks before. Both lines were about same size, but the day registration line moved faster. It took me 40 minutes to get my number and then I had to get in another line for my shirt. Since "packet pickup" was not supposed to open until 2 p.m., it was pure dumb luck that I showed up at 1:30. This led to a comical race to the car and changing my clothes in the car in hopes that I could make the start at 2:30. Fortunately they delayed the start. I enjoyed this run and because of its proximity and the time of year, I will probably repeat even though it didn't rate it higher in stars. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
