Nov 14, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Steamtown Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Steamtown Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.7 
Organization 4.9 
Spectators 4.7
Number of comments: 625 [displaying comments 601 to 611]
|
A Runner from Duncannon, Pa.
(10/10/2001)
"Course is definitely faster than previous years." (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 Anyone who can handle running downhill well, will be able to run a faster PR for a marathon on this course. I had and still do have some upper chest congestion and at 54 managed to do a 3:04:31 for a new PR. If you train, you will be faster and be able to qualify for the Boston Marathon. Others brag about a fast course. Well, this one is exactly that. I base that on the 50 marathons I did over the last 3 years and 7 months. Although relatively new to running, I absorbed quite a bit of experience in a short running career. | |
|
A Runner from Washington PA
(10/10/2001)
"Downhill course?" (about: 2001)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 Judging from previous comments, the 2001 version of Steamtown was par for the course: great organization, enthusiastic volunteers, supportive spectators. Trouble at the start with slower runners who lined up in front. Race organizers should make this a point of emphasis next year--the start is fairly narrow and has several quick turns, and I had real trouble finding room to run early on. The elevation profile of the course shows a long, steady downhill with a few bumps early and late. In reality, most of the significant downhill is early in the race, and it would be easy to overreach and burn your quads up. The middle section is mostly flat with some rolls, and the last few miles had some serious hills, even with the changes for 2001. The rail-trail segment was a great change of scenery. It is not the easy course that the graphic would suggest, but it still can be fast. A highly recommended marathon. | |
|
A Runner from Iceland
(10/10/2001)
"A beautiful course but tough near the very end" (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 This was my second marathon (I did Twin Cities last year). Overall I am very satisfied. The course through the woods offers spectacular fall colors and in the small towns along the way, spectators turn out in force to support the runners. Beware of two very tough hills near the end when entering Scranton. The organization was outstanding. | |
|
A Runner from Myerstown, Pennsylvania
(10/8/2001)
"Simply the best" (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 This is the best organized, directed, and run marathon I've seen. From the time you get off the bus at Forest City High School, until the finish line in downtown Scranton, you are treated wonderfully. Forget New York, Chicago, and especially forget Marine Corps. Steamtown does it all better. (On second thought, maybe don't forget them: big crowds could ruin this race just like it did them). The small-town atmosphere appeals to me a lot more than urban races. Beautiful course, wonderfully friendly people. My new favorite. | |
|
A Runner from New York City
(11/19/2000)
"Awesome, civilized, fast and fun" (about: 2000)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 This was my first marathon (NYC was supposed to be my first) but I did this as one of my final long training runs. Due to the mostly downhill nature of the course, I was able to run the first 22 miles effortlessly at my normal training pace. The hill between mile 23-24 probably would have been tough if I'd run up it--but it was easy to walk and not THAT long. Crowds were small but INCREDIBLY supportive. The high school student volunteers were great! The locals come out full force through all the small towns and make you feel really special. It was a great marathon to start with because you are very well taken care of before, during and after. At the start: you can wait indoors. At mile 22 - the porta-lav was CLEAN and had TP! At the finish - 3 people attend to you: one to record your number and time, one to put your medal on and one to put a mylar blanket on you. The weather was unexpectedly cold (33 at the start) but they were well stocked at the expo for unprepared runners. The bright fall foliage at the start was especially wonderful. AND - No-wait Post-race massage and a place for a hot shower nearby were FANTASTIC! | |
|
A Runner from Rockaway, New Jersey, USA
(10/18/2000)
"Well Organized and great spectator support." (about: 2000)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 The course, topography and spectator support were similar to the Boston marathon. The volunteers were always available, pleasant and helpful. The parking was plentiful and close to the finish line. I would do this marathon again and recommend it to my running friends. | |
|
A Runner from New York, NY
(10/16/2000)
"Excellent, Excellent, Excellent!!!" (about: 2000)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Perfect organization, great course, and good support. Some highlights: fast downhill course (but beware of uphills at mile 23-24 and 25-25.5), no lines at the porta-potties pre-race (that's important to me!), lots of fan support (while not deep, they were there every few hundred yards and loud!), no wait at the massage tables post-race (no wait even for the back-of-packers!) - fast, fun, and friendly. A great mid-sized race and great Boston qualifier. Need I say more? | |
|
A Runner from Syracuse,NY
(10/16/2000)
"Excellent course and field size." (about: 2000)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 First class course and organization. Spectators were friendly and supportive even on a cold morning. Course is fast but beware of the downhills they can really put a burn on your quads. Would definitely run again. Nice field size. | |
|
A Runner from Georgia
(10/11/2000)
"Great marathon" (about: 1998)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Other than the Boston this was the best I've ever done. It would be a great first time marathon. | |
|
A Runner from Suburb of Minneapolis, MN USA
(8/16/2000)
"Area Supports Race; Do Downhill Training" (General Comments)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 4 (Run in 98) Pretty darn good race with a field size I like. Area really supports race and runners, and fellow runners great. Some huge pockets of support, but some bare spots (though enough fellow runners for company). Found out the hard way downhills are still hills and take it out of you... I advise prospective participants to do downhill training. Beware uphills in last 3 miles. One minor gripe (and this problem might have been resolved): start area was packed and start slower than it ought to be; a fair number of people were not lined up pace-appropriately. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
