Nov 15, 2024
Current Year Results
Results Search
Biggest/Best Boston Qualifier
2024 Results
2023 Results
2022 Results
2021 Results
2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
2016 Results
2015 Results
2014 Results
2013 Results
2012 Results
2011 Results
2010 Results
2009 Results
2008 Results
2007 Results
2006 Results
2005 Results
2004 Results
2003 Results
2002 Results
2001 Results
2000 Results
☰
Bayshore Marathon Runner Comments
Back to Bayshore Marathon Information & Reviews
Course 4.8 
Organization 4.6 
Spectators 3.9
Number of comments: 247 [displaying comments 231 to 241]
|
A Runner from Ohio
(6/1/2002)
"Great course, almost too many runners" (about: 2002)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 1 FANS: 2 Flat scenic out-and-back course. No clocks so make sure you wear a watch. As an out an back course on two-lane roads, the field of 850 runners is about all this race can support. The first (and last) mile were on a road full of potholes. After that the course was great. A PR type of course. Poor organization meant long lines at packet pick-up. Water stops were confusing as volunteers had both powerade and water. Make sure you know what your getting. More runners than ever were drenched with red powerade. Few fans. If you need spectators, this is not the race for you. | |
|
A Runner from New Hampshire, USA
(5/31/2002)
"A Good Michigan Option" (General Comments)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 3 FANS: 3 If you are trying to run all 50 states, this is a great way to run a beautiful course in a spectactular part of Michigan (I am from New Hampshire). Lots of options for the family too, so it can be a good family adventure (check the dunes out). The race is well managed, but I have two improvement suggestions: first, the finish line has no 'cool down' space after the finish... you cross and immediately they want you to stop and give your chip...in about 50 feet!. Second, with only 1000 runners or so, I thought they really could have announced each finisher, the last .2 miles is on a track, so they have plenty of time to get your number, look up your name, and announce it. But, as a 'smaller' marathon, it is a great way to see a part of a beautiful state and not just do another 'big city' race. The course is very gentle, along the bay the whole way, and has lots of stuff to look at. While it is open to cars, I never thought there was a problem. Lots of hotels are right in walking distance, too! | |
|
A Runner from Kalamazoo, Michigan
(5/28/2002)
"Nice, flat course, but watch out for the cars!" (General Comments)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 2 FANS: 3 This is an excellent marathon, featuring an out and back course along water. Two big improvements would make it even better: there are cars allowed on the course, even when there are runners going both ways. BAD! And the refreshments at the end were meager. Be aware of changing weather: 2002 race started out calm, sunny, and beautiful, but later it turned cloudy, windy, cold, and rainy. Hang on to those gloves! | |
|
A Runner from Charlotte, Michigan
(5/27/2002)
"Beautiful course, well-run, small marathon." (about: 2002)
COURSE: 4 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 This is a very flat and scenic course. The volunteers, particularly the monitors on bikes, were extremely encouraging. I have run 8 marathons and this is my favorite. Small town charm. This is not a closed course, which was the only drawback. Great fun. | |
|
A Runner from Dearborn, Michigan
(8/17/2001)
"Fantastic for a First!" (General Comments)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 4 Course was Beautiful - winding, flat, picturesque road along the Old Mission Peninsula. With ~650 runners, the size is great for a first marathon - plenty of portapotties and refreshments. As a small event, there were few frills (Only water and all-sport at the aid stations) but much easier to reunite and see your friends along the way. One runner's husband met her every 2 miles with her baby. My mother handed me half a banana in mile 20 for a quick refuel. Try THAT at Chicago! Traverse City and the surrounding area is perfect for a weekend getaway before and after the run. My only suggestion is to get someone at the local college to do a better T-Shirt design! | |
|
A Runner from USA- Clinton Michigan
(6/11/2001)
"Nice small marathon. Great for first timers." (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Good marathon to run for first time marathon runners.The size makes it good for the personal fans I had. I was able to get a lot of support from my family and friends who came along. | |
|
Marlene Prentice from Johannesburg, South Africa
(6/1/2001)
"Overall - Excellent" (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 5 Flat, fast course, excellent support from supporters and other runners, very scenic,a definite PB race or ease into the summer training without overstraining, amazing dedication and commitment from the hosting club and organizers to make it a memorable event, definitely worth making a trip to Traverse City for this one. | |
|
A Runner from Chicago
(5/29/2001)
"Good race" (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 5 FANS: 2 I enjoyed the race very much and I recommend it. The course is flat and extends along a scenic, lightly populated peninsula. I have run the Chicago marathon a few times, and this is a completely different event. I liked both and I can't say one is better; they are just different. While the big urban race has lots of runners and lots of fans, this race had a great small town feel to it. Logistics (e.g. packet pick up, parking, getting to the starting line, reuniting with my wife) were much easier than Chicago. As a runner, the course was easier to navigate because I didn't have to jockey for position at the start or at aid stations. Also, my wife was easily able to get to and see me at 5 or 6 spots along the course. The race entrance fee was cheap, although there was no expo and the goodies after the race were minimal. There weren't many fans, but it was cool and misting so that probably kept some fans away (although it made for ideal running conditions). But even if the weather were perfect, this is not a race that will attract a lot of fans. The fans that were out there were very supportive, of course, there just weren't too many of them. The aid stations were good and the miles clearly marked. Bring your own Gu or Power Gel because I didn't see any being handed out, but maybe I missed that. I ran my best time by several minutes at this race. I can't say how much the course has to do with that (who knows), but it is a good, fast course. | |
|
A Runner from Cleveland, Ohio
(5/29/2001)
"A very well-organized, runner-friendly event." (about: 2001)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 3 The 2001 event was my fifth marathon and without a doubt the most satisfying of all. The course was beautiful, as advertised. The terrific volunteers at well-staffed aid stations provided generous portions of ice-cold drinks (which is not always the case at larger marathons). Spectators were friendly and supportive, though limited in number due to the scenic layout of the course. If you feel the need to set a new PR this event is a wise choice. All in all the Bayshore was a well organized, fun-to-run marathon and I'd recommend it to anyone. | |
|
A Runner from Pittsburgh
(5/27/2001)
"A great PR marathon" (General Comments)
COURSE: 5 ORGANIZATION: 4 FANS: 2 I ran in 2001 and PRed. The course is flat, and right along the bay--very beautiful. This is a small marathon with little crowd support unless you bring your own. The aid stations were well manned with cheerful volunteers. Weather in 2001 was great, lo 50s, drizzle. I'd recommend this race to anyone looking for a perfect course. |
Quick Links
Marathon Search
Upcoming US Marathons
Upcoming International Marathons
Search Marathon Results
Latest Running News
Recent Newsletters
Race Director Tools
© 2000-2024, All Rights Reserved by MarathonGuide.com LLC
